18.8K views
Share this with your network
You've probably noticed that humans are generally irrational beings largely driven by fear of threats and, to a lesser extent, the promise of rewards. The good news? Understanding your underlying drivers can help you to be a more effective person and better leader.
David Rock’s SCARF Model identifies status, certainty, autonomy, relatedness and fairness as fundamental stimuli that either encourage a 'threat or reward' responses.
A TOOL FOR LEADERSHIP.
Understanding and acting on these factors can provide greater self-awareness and personal effectiveness, as well as enable more effective leadership, influence, and collaboration. The model particularly considers rewards that encourage an ‘approach’ response and threats that lead to an ‘avoid’ response, as motivated by five stimuli.
THE FIVE STIMULI IN MORE DETAIL.
The five stimuli are:
- Status: the relative importance of an individual to others and their own sense of worth as a result.
- Certainty: being able to predict future events with few major surprises.
- Autonomy: being able to have control over oneself and events.
- Relatedness: a sense of connection and safety in relation to others.
- Fairness: a perception of a just and fair environment.
LIMBIC MODE.
Importantly, when you are in a threat state — potentially triggered by any of these stimuli — your brain sinks into a ‘limbic’ mode, incapable of effective higher-order thinking or social interaction.
In other words, when you’re threatened, your conscious brain will leave the building and leave your actions to the whim of that prehistoric 'lizard brain' you’re still carrying around. By contrast, when you're in the reward state, your brain is able to be more creative, thoughtful and collaborative.
LINK TO PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY.
If you’re recognising some similarities with the Psychological Safety model, you’d be absolutely right. Both models identify similar issues though take a slightly different approach to address it.
Rock tends to use more ‘neuroscience-inspired' terminology, and the cynic in me knows that using such terminology can be more persuasive. But, cynicism aside, the strength of Rock’s model lies in providing a specific checklist that can be used by leaders to better create safety for themselves and others.
Actionable Takeaways
- Use SCARF as a self-awareness checklist.
Start with yourself and bring awareness to whether you are in a threat or reward state. Go deeper by checking yourself against the SCARF stimuli and consider what you can do to shift your current state as a result.
- Use SCARF as a collaboration checklist.
When leading or collaborating with others, consider their potential state and openness to collaborate based on the SCARF factors. If one element is lacking, potentially driving them towards a ‘threat’ response, understand the limits of potential engagement until that factor can be addressed or it can be mitigated by providing greater rewards through the other factors.
- Actively reduce threats and increase rewards.
Work to reduce threats and increase rewards in each of the areas:
- Status: use effective feedback that builds on strengths and addresses negatives in a targeted, specific manner, plus acknowledge individual contributions.
- Certainty: acknowledging uncertainty with high levels of transparent communication. Break down what is known and the process of engagement moving forward. Focus on predictable routines even in ambiguous situations.
- Autonomy: providing options and choices for people, moving away from micromanaging by establishing goals and leaving the ‘how’ to them.
- Relatedness: identifying shared experiences and approaches as a base to build safety, reducing blame and supporting psychological safety.
- Fairness: again focusing on transparency, communication and ensuring that processes and/or third parties help to interrupt bias and provide greater objectivity.
Explore More
SCARF Model is featured in these playbooks:
There is an inherent challenge of applying the SCARF model once threat responses are already triggered given that higher-order thinking and problem-solving are reduced in those situations. This particularly relates to applying it for self-awareness.
In many situations when applying it to support collaboration, it will be problematic to ascertain the likely state of others, who will respond in unique and different ways to each of these factors.
